Educational
Readings Friday 29th March 2019
The 7th
April is the last day to make your views
known about the proposals included in the Tomorrow’s Schools Review report ‘Our Schooling Future: Stronger Together’.
The report
outlines the possibility of the biggest change in our education system since
the introduction of the original Tomorrow’s Schools over three decades ago.
Before
Tomorrow’ Schools primary schools were administered by regional Education
Boards. These Boards appointed teachers, provided advisory help and looked
after school finance and grounds. Alongside the Boards were Education
Department Inspectors who assessed teacher and school performance. There was no
doubt that these Boards needed revision but, in the change to self-managing
schools, a ‘few babies were thrown out with the bathwater’.
For
those involved in Tomorrow’s Schools they were exciting times. BOTs members had
to be appointed and were soon involved in preparing Charters and writing
endless policies and facing up to
building and grounds issues. Sadly not all schools were equal and some found it difficulty gaining expertise from BOT members.
building and grounds issues. Sadly not all schools were equal and some found it difficulty gaining expertise from BOT members.
are now paying the price and the inequality resulting from the changes sees schools now enrol students disadvantaged by this inequality. It is also true to say many citizens gained in wealth and some schools (mainly it seems large secondary schools) in high socio economic areas thrived – and today, understandably through self-interest, are resisting any changes.
The ‘self-managing’
aspect of schooling was also lost to a degree when the National government
introduced the New Zealand Curriculum along with a set of Learning Area
documents, each of which outlined strands, level of achievement
and an impossible number of learning objectives to be assessed and reported on. In 2007 a Labour government saw the light of day and introduced (in 2007) a totally revised New Zealand Curriculum which had (has) broad acceptance. Sadly before this could be ‘bedded in’ a new National government introduced their reactionary National Standards along with assessment and documentation demands enforced by ERO.
and an impossible number of learning objectives to be assessed and reported on. In 2007 a Labour government saw the light of day and introduced (in 2007) a totally revised New Zealand Curriculum which had (has) broad acceptance. Sadly before this could be ‘bedded in’ a new National government introduced their reactionary National Standards along with assessment and documentation demands enforced by ERO.
So
that brings us to today. A new government and no National Standards and the
Review.
Things
need to change.
Promised levels of student achievement have not eventuated and
the system is not working well enough for our most disadvantaged.
the system is not working well enough for our most disadvantaged.
We need a
different way to think about our schooling system.
Please
read the Review document and the voices below speaking out for and against.
Make an email submission of your concerns and view to tomorrows.schools@education.govt.nz
Further
information about the Review is available
Allan Alach Bruce
Hammonds
Take a quick look at the articles
below both for and against.
Tomorrow's
Schools quick submission guide from the NZEI and their response to the Review.
‘The government is
currently reviewing Tomorrow’s Schools – the name given to the reforms that
dramatically changed our schools nearly 30 years ago - and the NZEI wants to make
it easy for you to have your say about the future of education.’
Tomorrow
when the war began
Auckland Grammar - against!! |
‘A very balanced review of
the Tomorrow’s Schools Review in which she faces up to the criticism of the
Auckland Alliance of large secondary schools against the proposals. Claire is
concerned with every school, not just those that have done well under the
current system.’
Choice
vs Equity: A Personal Response to Tomorrows' Schools Review
‘I have been quite
surprised to see the response from some to “Say no to the Haque Plan”. First of
all, it is not the Haque Plan, rather it is the Tomorrow’s Schools Review
Report and should be
referred to as such.Secondly, it contains many
recommendations falling under 8 key issues, making it very difficult to give the
whole report a blanket ‘Yes’ or ‘No’. Anyone with an open-minded approach would
find favour with some of the recommendations, would be unsure about some and
would want to explore further, and would be quite opposed to others. A
consultation process allows such a range of responses to be submitted and
considered.’
Maurie Abraham - for |
Education
Hubs sensible and overdue
‘Opinion: I notice some of
my principal colleagues have taken against the recommendation of the Tomorrow's
Schools
Taskforce to introduce Education Hubs, a regional structure that will
take over some of the jobs done by principals and boards of trustees. Here's why I think Hubs are a sensible and
overdue change to the way we run our school system.’
A principal's opinion |
Schools
launch $20,000-plus campaign against Tomorrow's Schools reforms
‘The "Community
Schools Alliance", backed by 43 of the country's 2431 state and integrated
schools, opposes a scheme by a task force led by former principal Bali Haque
for about 20 regional "hubs" to take over most powers from elected
school boards.’
Dr
Liz Gordon – the result of 30 years of Tomorrow’s Schools
‘Two main societal effects
occurred in the 30 years of school choice.
First, ‘exclusive’ schools became larger and larger, milking their
social cachet as the top schools in the country for financial and reputational
gain. That such status was so patently
unearned, forged from the social and educational characteristics of their
privileged, ready-to-learn, white students and large parental donations, was a
source of particular angst for me Second, schools at the ‘top’ and ‘bottom’ of the social spectrum faced increasing social separation.’
Cathy
Wylie outlines new wave of change for New Zealand Schools 2012!
Cathy Wylie - for |
Trust
Teachers—They’re the Experts
‘His subsequent book, What
School Could Be Ted Dintersmith,
describes the best of what he saw—and highlights his fervent belief in the value of teacher expertise, student agency, and locally derived solutions. Taken as a whole, the book is a rallying cry for an overhaul of the American educational system.’
describes the best of what he saw—and highlights his fervent belief in the value of teacher expertise, student agency, and locally derived solutions. Taken as a whole, the book is a rallying cry for an overhaul of the American educational system.’