I came across this article and it resonated so much with my thoughts I have posted it as a blog
(Cite This Article as: Teachers College Record, Date Published: February 06, 2012)
|
Our current test orientated system |
by Russell Hvolbek — February 06, 2012
I argue that as we absorb the socio-economic values of our
age, an age ruled by business, we have drifted away from what we in the
educational community should be doing: teaching students to think, to see, to
read, and to write.
Education as a dwelling in the human experience of reality
is ending. As with the Roman Empire, it is ending with a whimper, not a bang.
The root of the problem is that we have absorbed the
socio-economic and intellectual values of our age, an age ruled by business and
science. The pragmatic values of business and science have become the values of
our educational practices.
Within these two orientations there is little
understanding of and no place for the life enhancing studies of philosophy,
history, literature, and the arts. Today we train students. A practical utility
determines our thinking.
Pragmatic and useful things, of course, are easy to evaluate
and quantify, but when the useful is quantified it precipitates a judgment:
5,500 square foot houses are superior to 1,500 square foot houses. An “A” is
superior to a “B” and an “A” student is superior to a “B” student.
Measurements. Judgments. The accountant’s truths are what are now deemed
important.
That the accountant’s truths seem clear and distinct to us
is a statement about the seriousness of the problem. For such ideas have become
our common sense. The objectifications we now deem as truths are merely the
dominating judgments our age. We have forgotten that they are all based upon
ingrained and unanalyzed prejudices, and that every judgment is a statement
about the values of the person making the judgment. Today we have fallen in
love with objectively quantifying reality and see it as a solution to our
problems. Today students are judged and judge themselves based upon such
pitiful scales, the scales of measurement.
Moreover, the goals of business humans are to make money and
do it as efficiently and quickly as possible. They desire exact facts and data
to help them make money. Business humans live for a goal.
We have created educational institutions that do the same.
We have reduced education into a goal, a goal that is antithetical to education
itself. Our educational practices are ruled by haste, guided by the belief that
acquiring information is important, but simultaneously and contradictorily that
the information serves a higher end, viz., getting a good grade; which in turn
serves a higher end: getting into college; which in turn serves a higher end:
getting a good job; which in turn serves a higher end: getting a house on
Mullholand.
|
The trouble with targets you don't notice the ones you miss. |
This prevents students from entering into the process of
learning itself. They are taught to learn information for a reason ulterior to
learning itself: a grade. This alienates them from the simple joy of learning,
an activity that is a process and cannot be quantified. Examinations are
reduced to the recollection of data and facts as though disparate data can
fascinate anyone, much less be retained.
Learning for an objectively determined social goal has
serious consequences: It justifies cheating and lying and deceptions of all
kinds. Why not cheat if the only concern is the grade?
There are personal consequences to this orientation. Since
we all become what we do, when we cheat, lie, and deceive for our goal, we
become cheaters, liars, and deceivers in quest of our goals. Barry Bonds ended
up playing baseball for the record books, not for the love of the sport.
Cheating the system was justified and rewarded with fame and the money that our
social and business values dictate as our ultimate success.
The reduction of things to the quantifiable and to an end
makes shallow a world that is deep; it makes dull a species that should be
complex; it makes unthinking, uninvolved humans; it reduces human life to
quantities: more money, more fame; more things, higher test scores. We aren’t
interested in education; we are interested in getting things out of what passes
for education.
Strangely, even in educational institutions the word
education is not analyzed. It is a word that everyone believes they clearly
understand. Like the words love, spirit, evil, justice, the word education fits
easily into each and every culture’s biases, into each and every human’s
prejudices. Thus it flits between being used by anyone and everyone for their
own benefit.
The German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, responding to
what he saw as the dismal state of education in Germany after Bismarck unified
the Reich, writes that an education is learning to see, to think, to read, and
to write.
These are fundamental and powerful words, and they can be
applied to any subject in the educational curriculum. In every subject students
need to learn how to see, to think, to read, and to write.
Let us think about these words. They are all verbs. They are
not like our goal-oriented cultural assumptions about education that posit
goals as the point of education. Verbs are not closed, exact words. They are
not facts, and they are not mere information. Verbs designate activities. This
means that education is an activity, a process, and an ongoing involvement done
for the sake of the involvement itself. When one applies oneself to this task,
this thinking and seeing what thinking and seeing might be, one is in the
process of being a student. One begins to get an education when one initiates
the process of seeing and thinking.
( Seeing learning as a verb, a 'doing word', is in line with an important phrase from the currently almost sidelined 2007 New Zealand Curriculum - students should 'seek, use and create their own knowledge'.)
Nietzsche elaborates by writing: “to see” means “accustoming
the eye to calmness, to patience, to letting things come up to it postponing
judgment, learning to go around and grasp each individual case from all sides …
not to react at once to a stimulus, but to gain control of all the inhabiting,
excluding instincts. Learning to see, as I understand it, is . . . called a
strong will: the essential feature is precisely not to ‘will’—to be able to
suspend decision.” In education, haste is not the path.
Thus education in all matters demands openness to the other
and not imposing a knee-jerk opinion upon the subject matter. The subject must
be allowed to teach the student.
When one learns to see one will have become altogether
“slow, mistrustful, recalcitrant. One will let strange, new things of every
kind come up to oneself.” Seeing is to lie “servilely on one’s stomach before
every little fact, always prepared for the leap of putting oneself into the
place of, or of plunging into others and other things.”
Seeing allows oneself to be struck by the seen, the other,
the flowers, the poem.
In this sense, seeing requires that we forget the name of
the thing being seen.
All objectivity is bad taste, merely a symptom of one or
another prejudice. The businessman may want objectivity. The student wants
nuance.
Thinking, writing and reading are separate but similar
skills that must be learned. “Thinking wants to be learned like dancing, as a
kind of dancing.” “One must be able to dance with one’s feet, with concepts,
with words.” Writing is learning to dance with a pen, a brush, a basketball, on
a wrestling mat or on a soccer field. Reading is learning to dance with a text,
a mathematical formula, a technique, a physics equation, an atom.
What a strange point! Dancing? Reading, writing, and sports
are a type of dance? Yes. Dancing is relating, it is being moved by the other
and moving with the other. Dancing is a relationship of movement, a
relationship of evolving steps and meanings. Education is an evolving dance
with intellectual ideas.
|
Learning like dance unfolds with experience |
In conclusion, the fact that students are not getting
educated is not their fault. They were weaned into these socio-cultural values.
Students are not participating in their education. Students are being trained
to live for goals and new electronic devices. Goals have become a narcotic that
society accepts as education, which they are not.
Education is not chasing a grade. It is not chasing a
college or a job. If you do that you may get what you want, an “A” or a “B,”
but you will never be educated. An education is a process. It has a beginning
but no end. It continues throughout life. It is learning to see and think.
Ultimately an education is a deep unfolding involvement with
life here on earth. The deeper the involvement in seeing and thinking, the more
complex is the dance in which you participate.