What has happened to a fair go for all?
Recently I attended a meeting to hear Max Rashbrooke talk
about the findings from the book he edited called ‘Inequality A New Zealand Crisis’ published 2013.
There are those who suggest that the inequality gap will
become a key election issue in 2014. The divide between the richest and poorest
New Zealander has widened alarmingly over recent decades- faster than in most
other developed countries. The effects of this inequality, the contributors to the book
write, will affect us all.
God’s own country – once supposedly the best place to bring up kids in the
world, seems no longer to be the case. A country originally founded to escape the worst of the class structure of
England seems to have given up on the idea of giving a fair go to all citizens.
The view of many well off people now is that the poor are the authors of their own
misfortune and only need to set about and pull up their socks and all will be well;
there seems little empathy for those in difficult situations.
'Greed is good!" |
Is this divided disconnected world of rich and poor to be our
future? Is there an alternative?
The contributors in Rashbrooke’s book share a common concern
about the societal risks posed by the growing severe income disparity and with a desire for
the issue to be properly debated.
Since the 1980s the number of poor has doubled. No matter
how one defines poverty it is obvious that there a growing number suffering stressful lives
just to survive from day to day. In contrast the top 1 per cent owns three times
as much wealth as the poorest 50 per cent. The rich are growing richer.
Any free country will
have differences in income but in New Zealand the gap is reaching a tipping
point. Poverty is deepening for a growing number of citizens. Child poverty is
reaching between 170,000 and 270,000, somewhere between 1 in 5 of our young.
Our current Minister of Education is busy blaming our schools for 1 in 5
children failing without drawing an obvious relationship to 1 in 5 children living in poverty!. The answer to school failure all too often lie outside the school gates. One report places New Zealand’s child
health and wellbeing as 28th out of 30 developed countries. Add in
issues of poor housing, high prison rates (where New Zealand has one of the
highest rates in the Western World) and unemployment particularly of young Maori
and Pacifica and the problem is hard to ignore. One in five Maori and Pacific
households live in poverty. Around 800,000 New Zealanders live below the
poverty line as determined by the amount of disposable income after taxes paid
and benefits and tax credits added.
Schools are failing 1 in 5 |
While many well off New Zealanders tend to ignore the
problem the contributors to Rashbrooke’s book make the point that poverty is
not just a problem for the poor. In more equal societies people have a greater
chance to advance than in unequal societies – there are greater equality of
opportunities available to encourage creativity and innovation.
In our school environment it is not an achievement gap that
is the problem it is more an opportunity gap – too many young children, through
no fault of their own, enter school lacking opportunities to give them a good
start. These opportunities need to be provided before children reach school
combined with schools developing more personalised approaches that value theexperiences and voice of their students. Unfortunately, as students move
through the system, as a result of ability grouping, streaming and a focus onacademic education, many children fail to realise their potential.
NZ leading in all the wrong areas |
The current government’s answer is to place faith on economic
growth but while obviously important it is not sufficient. Those in the lowest 10 per
cent of incomes are no richer than they were in 1987 – incomes for many has
fallen while the rich have become richer. There is substantial research which suggests
high levels of income inequality can stifle economic growth.
Inequality matters.
Inequality matters.
Unequal societies produce dysfunctional results. The authors of the book ‘The Spirit Level’ (2010) make a compelling case that countries
with higher levels of income inequality perform worse than more equal countries
such as the Netherlands and Scandinavian countries. New Zealand, for example,
has five times the teenage pregnancies as Sweden.
Inequality also breaks down social cohesion which has
consequences for democracy alienating the voices and concerns of those excluded from power with the result that a great number see little point in voting.
Inequality also results in weakened economic growth by
depriving society of the contributions of a wider workforce and their associated
spending power of those out of work or on incomes that barely allow them to survive. In contrast those with power argue instead for policies that further their
own self-interest. More equal countries crack down on such unfairness.
The book makes it clear we are all worse off for having wide
income gaps in New Zealand
There was a time when New Zealand was said to be leading the
world in creating a modern inclusive democracy.
As a result the difficult economic times of the 70s the Labour
Government introduced radical changes – a market forces economy was introduced following the
lead of the Thatcher government and the Reagan administration. An emphasis on market
forces, deregulation, private enterprise (including privatisation of government
assets) with its promise of wealth trickling down to workers became the new
ideology.
Trickle down in reality became more trickle up and as a result the rich
got richer and the poor poorer leading to the situation we now face in New
Zealand; self-interest has trumped the common good. Once again this is in contrast
to such countries as Denmark which developed a fully open economy while at the same time reducing
inequality. The more egalitarian societies of Sweden, Denmark, Norway and the
Netherlands have generally grown as fast or faster than the more unequal
societies of the US, Britain, Canada, and New Zealand.
Once we were proud to be an egalitarian society – a fair
society for all.
Unfortunately too many of the middle classes have internalised the neo liberal market forces ideology of the past decades and see little real alternative and prefer to focus on the political party
that protects whatever gains they have made even if the common good ( and our
environment) is eroded. They have become self obsessed conservatives unable to
see the impending crisis ahead resulting from inequality.
What is required is for a new ideology, based on creating theconditions to develop the talents of all rather than leaving it to the
vagaries of market forces with its emphasis on financial ends
Governments make a difference – one way or the other. The time
is right for some new thinking; it is not the time to return to the past state
control but to pioneer new ideas to the benefit of all – and our ever fragile
environment. Thinking based around opportunity, fairness and creativity.
When it comes to providing opportunity, once conditions of
poverty has been faced up to , education is the key. An education that looksto the future rather than replicating the past. An education premised on developing
the gifts and capabilities of all learners; a system that engages all.
The late Sir Paul Callaghan argued, ‘If we care for our environment and create a just, equitable and creative society then we can attract the best in the world.’
Sir Paul Callaghan |
The late Sir Paul Callaghan argued, ‘If we care for our environment and create a just, equitable and creative society then we can attract the best in the world.’
Time for all to revive the ideals of democracy in our country to
celebrate and recognise the voices of all. Our country, our diverse people, and
our unique environment, are too important to leave to the self-interest of the
market, the rich and the corporations.
Only if we all work towards ensuring everyone gets a fair go
will we work towards Paradise Regained.
No comments:
Post a Comment