I welcome suggested articles, so if you come
across a gem, email it to me at allanalach@inspire.net.nz
Sorry, Nicky, I’m out.
An English teacher writes an open letter of
resignation to UK Secretary of Education Nicky Morgan. If you think your
version of GERM is bad, I’d suggest that England possibly tops the scale.
“Please accept this as written notice of my resignation from my
role as Assistant Head and class teacher. It is with a heavy heart that I write
you this letter. I know you’ve struggled to listen to and understand teachers
in the past so I’m going to try and make this as clear as possible. In the six
short years I have been teaching your party has destroyed the Education system.
Obliterated it. Ruined it. It is broken.”
Reading on a Screen Rather Than Paper May Affect What You Learn,
Study Shows
Here’s another article suggesting that we may
need to be more careful about believing the hype about technology.
‘A new study suggests that it’s not only what you read, but how you
read it that matters.
Reading on paper versus on a digital screen may impact what you end
up absorbing from the text, according to a study by Dartmouth researchers. This
research is being presented at the Association for Computing Machinery
conference in San Jose, California, this week, and has not yet been published
in a peer-reviewed journal. In the study, people who used computer screens for
learning did better when it came to understanding concrete details, but they
had more difficulty understanding abstract concepts.’
It’s the Environment, Stupid
Annie Murphy Paul
Read about Paul Toughs findings |
Inverse Relationship Between GPA and Innovative Orientation
The more students focus on test scores, the less
creative they become.
Another article by Peter Gray.
Testing out creativity! |
Study: Teaching Students Philosophy Will Improve Their Academic
Performance
An interesting study from England.
Socrates and philosophy |
The Disturbing Transformation of Kindergarten
‘One of the most distressing characteristics of education reformers
is that they are hyper-focused on how students perform, but they ignore how
students learn. Nowhere is this misplaced emphasis more apparent, and more
damaging, than in kindergarten.’
Contributed by Bruce Hammonds:
A chance to
look around three classrooms
Michael Fullan believes in an educational
transformation? Pearson's role in education: A Rich Seam: How Pedagogies Find Deep
Learning.
Bruce’s latest article.
‘Pearson's version of 'personalized learning'
relies on 'data driven analytics' and technology to ensure learning.
Some of the schools following a 'Pearson's approach' look more like
high powered traditional schools with students learning through digital technology.
My preference is the New High Tech approach, which is also
referenced in the 'Rich Seams' document - a real world activity based school
making use of a wide range of technology from carpentry tools to
computers.’
Larry Rosenstock:Wise words from New Tech High |
Another Annie Murphy Paul article.
‘A head-slappingly obvious (yet often
overlooked) point: Why are we spending millions upon millions of dollars on unproven
technologies, when there are so many empirically-proven techniques from
cognitive science and psychology that are going virtually unused?’
From Bruce’s ‘goldie oldies’ file:
Before there was ‘grit’ we had ‘resilience’.
‘Bamboos are a great symbol of resilience,
bending in the wind and quickly growing if it comes to the worst. Going with
the flow and knowing when to sidestep are important skills of learning. It is
all about resilience. Students at school
need help develop to learn to stick at tasks and to persevere so as to gain the
satisfaction of achieving something they didn’t know they could do. Naturally
the task has to be meaningful and worthwhile to the individual.’
Seymour Papert : The obsolete 'Three Rs' - blocking real change in
education
Bruce’s comment: The place of the ‘three Rs’ in
an age of computers. Worth reading if you teach in a MLE.
‘All this Victorian emphasis on the ‘three Rs’ according
to people like Professor Seymour Papert, a highly respected MIT expert in
learning and computers, ‘expresses the most obstinate block to change in
education’.’ The role of the basics’, he writes, ‘is never discussed; it is
considered obvious’. As a result other important educational developments are
being ignored. Papert is not questioning the importance of ‘the Rs’- children
cannot learn effectively in all curriculum areas without them but they need too
be 'reframed' to be seen as foundation skills to allow students to learn rather
than ends in themselves.’
The urge to collect- and display
How can you incorporate this in your classroom?
‘When you visit people’s homes what they collect and display
indicates what is important to them. Nothing is displayed with out some thought
behind the object – each object has its own story to tell to the collector and
to a visitor. Collections reflect the personality and interests of the owners.
The urge to collect starts young and for some people early interests become
lifetime occupations often turning into careers.’
No comments:
Post a Comment