Tuesday, July 10, 2012

Creative teaching - the only alternative to school failure; Sir Ken Robinson leads the way - but who is actually following.


'Creativity is just as important as literacy and numeracy'
 Tell that to the Ministry of Education and the Government.


Share with other creative schools or teachers and Board of Trustee members

First TED talk - over 9 million downloads


Second TED Talk
Talk with graphics - excellent


The Government is right in believing schools should do a lot better. No student should leave school feeling a failure. The trouble is their approach is wrong, and ironically, with its desire for all students to be assessed against National Standards, is creating ‘winners and losers’ environment and in the process narrowing the curriculum and encourages teaching to the tests.
Sir Ken Robinson call this standardisation a fast food approach; an  approach that has its genesis in the past industrial age.
As thoughts are returning to beginning a new term it is worthwhile taking the time to listen to the wise, and often entertaining, ideas of Sir Ken.  It would also be a good idea to pass the links on to other teachers to Board of Trustee members.
Sir Ken, in his second TED Talk, says we are facing crisis as worrying as the climate change crisis – the crisis of not realising the talents of all students. Developing the unique talents of all students is an urgent challenge.
Most teachers are aware of Sir Ken’s comment that ‘creativity is as important as literacy and numeracy’. Creativity is all about developing people who love what they do –students who have not lost through formal school their innate desire to learn.
The problem, according to Sir Ken, is that education disconnects students from their talents  and , worse still, assesses students  only in literacy and numeracy – made even more destructive by the publishing of league tables.
What is required, Sir Ken believes, is not evolution but a real educational revolution –‘we need to transform current education into something else.’We need ‘educational transformation’.
To do this we need to challenge things we take for granted- things people think can’t be done in any other way. For me the blind spot in education is the clinging on to the idea of ability grouping, sorting, setting and streaming  issues tackled by the book ‘Learning Without Limits'. Literacy and numeracy targets and league tables will result in the problem of either poor or inflated self-images.
Sir Ken quotes Abraham Lincoln (1862) who said, ‘the dogmas of the past are inadequate to the stormy present… we must rise to the occasion. As our case in new we must think anew and act anew, we must disenthrall ourselves of ideas we take for granted. The way things are. Ideas that may have suited a previous century ‘but our minds are still hypnotised by them and we have to disenthrall ourselves of some of them.’
The trouble is, Sir Ken continues, ‘it is difficult to know what you take for granted because we take them for granted’. This applies to my thoughts about the use of ability grouping that determines forever how  students see themselves.
Sir Ken believes we are enthralled by (take for granted) linearity – that learning must go through predetermined tracks (think National Standards). Education, he believes, ought to be seen as more organic- rather like visiting an exhibition at an art gallery than learning from a book from start to finish.
Sir Ken says, ‘we create our lives symbiotically as we explore our circumstances through our talents’. We need, he says, to reconstitute ability through our diverse talents
The other big issues we fail to appreciate is conformity (once again think of National Standards). School system he says are being increasingly designed as fast food organisations for the mind. Everything is increasingly being standardised, predictable, fragmented.
I would add secondary school have long feature linearity of learning and conformity of students. Now it is being pushed on primary schools.
What we need instead, says Sir Ken,’ is for schools to customise Learning to the individual circumstances of individual students. We have sold ourselves into a fast food model of education and it is impoverishing our spiritual capacity just as fast food depletes our physical bodes.’
School have to recognise human identity is extremely diverse – children have a range of potential aptitudes’ to identify and amplify. ‘All learning is about passion - what excites our energy- about doing something you love – that you are good at.’
The reason why so many students opt out of education is because education doesn’t feed their spirit – it doesn’t feed the energy of their passion’. The current focus on numeracy and literacy, no matter how well intentioned, will not solve school failure.
Sir Ken believes we have to change our metaphors. We have to go from an industrial model to an agricultural one. From a manufacturing model based on linearity, conformity and ‘batching’ people (one again with ability grouping) to a model based on agriculture.
We have to recognise’, Sir Ken continues,’ that humans flourish not in a mechanistic process but rather in an organic one. It is impossible to predict the outcomes of human development – all we can do, as with a framer, is to create the conditions under which all students will flourish’.
Education can never be about cloning’ (  by I would add through imposed best practices, targets and National Standards) ‘it is about customisation and about personalisation; education to suit the circumstances of your students’.
‘This is the answer to the future. We need to develop a new system with appropriate support’ ( in New Zealand the 2007 New Zealand Curriculum’) ‘to help all schools develop appropriate systems based on a personalised curriculum taking advantage of thecreativity of teachers’.
We have an opportunity to revolutionize education but to achieve this we will have to change from an industrial model ( I would add also add to escape from the current corporateefficiency model) to an agricultural model where each school can flourish.
Sir Ken concluded his talk with a quote from a W B Yeats poem about a lover only able to offer not great cloaks  but only ‘my dreams  .I have spread my dreams at your feet. Tread softly because you tread on my dreams.’
‘Every day in every way our students spread their dreams at our feet and we too should tread softly’.


Saturday, July 07, 2012

Weekend Readings



Weekend Readings

 By Allan Alach

It is term break in New Zealand, and Australia, and the summer break in northern hemisphere countries, so I hope all teachers and principals are having a well earned rest. Look after number one! Or, as airlines say, put your own mask on first. You can’t help others if you don’t look after yourself.


I welcome suggested articles, so if you come across a gem, email it to me at allan.alach@ihug.co.nz.


This week’s homework!

League tables will create a stalinist education system?

While this was written from a New Zealand perspective, it fits any standards based education agenda.



How GERM is infecting schools around the world.

This is written by Pasi Sahlberg, author of “ Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn About Educational Change in Finland? and director general of Finland’s Center for International Mobility and Cooperation.



OMG… Please do not do this.

Just in case you thought you’d heard it all, here is the Republican Party policy for Texas education. Warning - nausea alert!



Teacher Incentive Pay Doesn't Work. Unions and Teachers-"We Told You So."



Where is the Future of Education?

Reflections by David Warlick (if you’ve not heard of him, he’s well worth investigating) on the future of education.

Does this section ring any bells for you?

"We’re being convinced that:

   The U.S. is falling behind other nations in education – that  our schools are failing.

   The success of schools and education can be precisely measured and quantified by a corporate testing industry and the constant testing of our children.

   Teachers, protected by labor unions, do not know what they’re doing.

   Business can do it better."


No Dentist Left Behind

This has been around for a while, but is well worth revisiting, to lift the gloom that can overpower us. Thanks to Danny Nicholls, Principal, St. Patrick's School, Taupo, for the link.


Thursday, July 05, 2012

Educational Books for Creative Teaching - to develop the gifts and talents of all students



This is the latest book I have read. I had promised myself to resist buying any more educational books but this is one I couldn’t resist. ‘Learning Without Limits’ faces up to what I have always believed to be the biggest block to developing the gifts and talents of all students – and exaggerating the so called ‘achievement tail’ in the process – the use of ability grouping, setting, streaming at all levels of schooling.


I will add my review when I have finished my reading. The book is based on analysing the classroom practices of nine teachers (selected to cover all levels of schooling). All the teachers selected believe strongly in the destructive effect of ability grouping on the students’ sense of self. Particularly grouping based on two learning areas – literacy and numeracy.

Over the years I have a lot of feedback from teachers thanking me for drawing their attention to books that I have written about on my blog. With this in mind I have searched through my postings for some of the best books that provide courage for teachers to make stand against the current anti educational approaches of a market forces competitive ideology.

Read what one respected principal has to say - is he alone in his thoughts?

So if you have time explore some of the links to some of my favourite books below. After reading my ‘review’ you might want to get the book for yourself – or share the blog with other teachers. How many are you aware of?

Wounded by School - is a powerful book that shows how students’ are affected negatively by schooling – something teachers don’t like to think about!

Mindsets - by Carol Dweck points out clearly why some students succeed or fail.

Motivation -the Drive  toLearn– by Daniel Pink is an excellent book on how to motivate learners.

The Game of School – by Perkins provides the means to ensure all students gain success. See also Smart Schools – an earlier book by Perkins.

What’s the Point of School by Guy Claxton. Claxton is well known to many New Zealand teachers. He believes all students can become powerful learners. ‘Learnacy is as important as literacy and numeracy’

In The Early World ( reprinted 2012 by NZCER) is an inspiration book by Elwyn Richardson New Zealand’s pioneer teacher of the 50/60s .

Experience and Education – John Dewey 1936. A seminal book for enlightened educators.

The Best Schools - by Thomas Armstrong. An excellent book to learn about the learning needs of students at different school levels.

The Underachieving School and How Children Learn by John Holt. Still two of the best books about life in school from students’ point of view.

Catching the Knowledge Wave -  by Jane Gilbert ( NZCER). An excellent book for secondary schools that want to move into the 21stC.

Our Secondary Schools Don’t WorkAnymore – By David Hood  (NZ) Title says it all.

Out of Our Minds – Sir Ken Robinson. If only politicians would take his advice. There must be few who haven’t watched his TED video ( Google it if not). ‘Creativity is as important as literacy and numeracy’ (Sir Ken)

Five Minds for the Future – Howard Gardner and how to transform schools to achieve them. Gardner is well known to NZ teachers for his multiple intelligences research. Currently schools limit themselves to two- literacy and numeracy.

Realizing the Power of Professional Learning – Helen Timperley. A books for creative principals to assist them develop the conditions to realize the creativity of their teachers.

The Passionate Learner – Robert Fried. Practical ideas to support creative teachers. Game of School by Robert Fried
Teaching in the Knowledge Society By   Hargreaves appreciates the need for creative school leadership if schools are to avoid soulless standardised learning.

Books by Stoll and Fink. Another book to inspire school leaders to appreciate it is about learning not just accountability.’ It’s about learning and it is about time.(Lost the link - will search it out!More from Dean. More from Stoll and Timperley

Powerful Learning- by Linda Darling Hammond and others.  An excellent book by a highly respected educator about how to develop inquiry learning across the curriculum. Practical examples. Another excellent practical book is Best Practices full of examples of powerful studies

School As A Home For The Mind –Art Costa. Costa is well known to many New Zealand Schools. The book cover how to develop intelligent behaviours in students -key learning competencies. Author of several books.

The Big Picture - by Dennis Littky A book for anyone serious about transforming secondary schools - for students who fail in our current system

Welcome to the Aquarium – By Julie Diamond. This is a fantastic and reassuring book for those who teach junior classes. All about how a year unfolds in a junior class.

Discovery Time by  Brenda Martin and Gay Hay. This very practical NZ book is a must for those who want to return real discovery learning back into their junior classrooms.

 I Am Five and I go to School by Helen May. This book celebrates the wonderful work done by Infant Mistresses of the 60s that led to the recognition of New Zealand's reputation for creative junior teaching that is now at risk!

 Scientists in the Crib by Gopnik, Meltzoff and Kubl. A really exciting book based on new research about how the very young are born with an innate desire to learn - until they reach formal schooling.  Ideal for new parents.

Be great if you could share with me books that have been important in helping you develop your teaching and learning beliefs. Send an e-mail or add through a comment.


Monday, July 02, 2012

Creating Conditions for Creativity. Steven Johnson's 'Where Good Ideas Come From'


I have really enjoyed this book that I picked up at Heathrow Airport last year - Johnson's book has a message for countries, organisations and schools if they want to develop creativity. Johnson’s book outlines the seven patterns of innovation from the Renaissance to satellites

Johnson writes about why some environments squelch new ideas; some environments seem to breed them effortlessly;environments that are powerfully suited to the creation, diffusion and adoption of new ideas.

The argument of his book that there are a series of shared purposes and patterns that recur again and again in unusually fertile environments. Johnson has distilled them down to seven patterns.

If organisations were to adapt them the better they would be in tapping extraordinary capacity for innovative thinking. Interestingly Johnson has discovered that these patterns also occur in the natural world. Johnson writes about the similar creativity of coral reefs and cities. Why are coral reefs and cities such fertile environments for creativity? Innovation, the book illustrates, depend on openness and collaboration as much as competition (‘survival of the fittest’) contrary to popular political beliefs.

If organisations such as schools and classrooms embraced the patterns Johnson has uncovered they would do better at nurturing new ideas. Johnson writes that we are better by connecting ideas than building walls around them – good ideas want to be free, they want to connect, fuse, recombine.

The Seven Patterns of Innovation

1 The adjacent possible –each new innovation opening up new ideas to explore. 

New ideas are built out of existing ideas – perhaps the best example is Gutenberg developing his printing press borrowing ideas from wine presses. Schools need to encourage teachers (and teachers in turn with their students) to explore and extend ideas of others.

2 Liquid networks – to develop ideas you need lots of ideas to connect to ideas you already have in your brain.

 In such a randomizing environment ideas collide with each other. Innovative systems have a tendency to gravitate towards the edge of chaos – too much order and they are squelched.  Good ideas flow from mind to mind. This was seen during the flowering of the Renaissance and in Silicon Valley. Individuals get smarter if they are in ideas rich environments.  Most brilliant ideas have messy beginnings and the best environments are where people can meet and share ideas – in early days coffee shops – a balance between order and chaos.

3 The slow hunch- most ideas Johnson found come into the world ‘half baked’.

 Ideas start with vague hunches – problems that haven’t yet been proposed. Ideas sometimes take years to be realized – at this point the conclusion my come in a flash- the eureka or light bulb moment. Contrary to popular thought ideas take time to develop – Darwin finally understanding the theory of evolution is a point in case. Highly pressurized environments ideas are destructive to the development of such thinking – there is just no time to pick up on hunches.

4 Serendipity –the power of accidental connections.

Serendipity is made up of happy accidents that completes hunch or opens up a new adjacent possible. Such ideas fill in gaps in the puzzle. The challenge is to develop ideas that foster these serendipitous connections. Serendipitous moments often happen at the oddest moment –while out on a walk or reading a book. Organisations such as Google are experimenting developing ideas to develop such serendipity to give good ideas opportunities to connect.

5 Error – great successes are developed through error.

The history of being spectacularly wrong is the key to innovation. Flemming discovered penicillin by accident but he was up to taking advantage of it – to learn through error. ‘Fertility of imagination and abundance of guesses at truth are the first requisites of discovery.’ ‘Error often creates a path that leads you out of comfortable assumptions’. ‘Being right keeps you in place. Being wrong forces you to explore’. ‘The trouble with error is that we have a natural tendency to dismiss it Evolution of species and ideas are developed through errors –or mutations. Being correct locks us into non thinking. The future is about failing faster – or ‘failing forward’ as car designer Honda once said.’

6 Exaptation- borrowing and connecting.

Once again Gutenberg modifying wine presses comes to mind.  Gutenberg was not interested in wine – he was interested in words but he borrowed an idea from another older technology.  The history of innovation abounds with exaptation including the World Wide Web – a sort of mental cross fertilisation.  Some organisations are ripe for exaptation. As mentioned places like coffee houses in early times –  places where people with diverse interests and expertise can meet and share. Chance favours the connected mind.

7 Platforms- environments that allow innovation.

 A coral reef provides a platform, or habitat, for a diversity of life to evolve.  Beavers build dams which are platforms for a range of plants and animals. is an exercise in intelligent behaviour.   Platforms open doors to the adjacent possible. The development of GPS provided a platform for all sorts of inventions.
What is required are environment that encourage people to think broadly and generally about task problems, ones which, if it were a school, where kids feel free to follow their curiosity – an environments that encourages interaction with others with expertise in other areas.

 The World Wide Web is a most impressive platform.   The web is an ecosystem for ideas to emerge. Facebook and twitter are platforms. In an open platform ideas can come from anywhere.  Connecting with other platforms provides an ideas advantage.  Good ideas more often lie outside platforms.  Ideas emerge best when you don’t have to ask permission.

 Johnson concludes his book by describing the kind of environments that have produced the best ideas. One thing is certain ideas do not arise from a competitive efficient market environment. The best ideas are a connected affair. The best ideas arise in decentralised environments that provide powerful opportunities to develop slow hunches, serendipity, exaptation, cross- fertilisation and emergent platforms.
In tightly controlled environments ideas are restrained or suffocated – cross fertilisation cannot occur if there are sentries by the door! The best platforms share ideas.  The internet allows ideas to flow and connect in serendipitous ways Today it is hard to stop new ideas.


Schools need to consider what needs to change to cultivate and promote good ideas and how to link with ideas from other schools or any place.  Ideas need to collide, emerge, and recombine.


Schools are not the best places to develop good ideas. They are not the learning organisations they claim to be.



.

Friday, June 29, 2012

Weekend Readings from Allan

Weekend Readings


By Allan Alach

A consistent refrain is ‘improving teacher quality.’ On the surface, this is not rocket science. However, if we step back from this meme, we see that this is essentially meaningless unless defined. What is ‘teacher quality?’ What are the criteria for a ‘quality teacher?’  At this point we hit the wall, and find that the definition of quality depends on the agenda of whatever group of people are doing the defining. In today’s technocratic world teacher quality is raising test scores (or similar), whereas in more enlightened times the definition will be much different. This reinforces that we must not use meaningless terms like this, as this just buys into the prevailing ideology.

I welcome suggested articles, so if you come across a gem, email it to me at allan.alach@ihug.co.nz.

This week’s homework!

The Hip-Hop Generation: Implications for Teacher Preparation

An interesting take on teacher preparation, overall, and especially for the urban environment.  Article discusses “Corporate vs Communal Teaching” - you can guess which one is which.


Beyond the Politics of the Big Lie: The Education Deficit and the New Authoritarianism

Thanks to Mary MacKay from Amsterdam for this article. The title says it all. While written about the USA, readers will very easily make the connection with their own countries. The similarity of the agenda internationally is no coincidence. Diane Ravitch has commented, ‘Believe me, the attack on public education was well planned and well messaged. Careful rhetoric about choice, excellence.’  She’s talking about the USA, however her comments are extremely apt for other countries. This is an international battle for child centred education and we must support each other.

http://truth-out.org/opinion/item/9865-beyond-the-politics-of-the-big-lie-the-education-deficit-and-the-new-authoritarianism

The Education System That Pulled China Up May Now Be Holding It Back

China wants inventors and entrepreneurs, but its schools, built around the notorious gaokao exam, are still designed to produce cookie-cutter engineers and accountants.”

So, hang on a tick, does this mean to say that ‘raising literacy and numeracy achievement’ is not the answer? Does this mean that standards/high stakes tests don’t ‘raise achievement’ and don’t produce well rounded, creative and innovative learners? What a surprise, who would have thought it.

http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/06/the-education-system-that-pulled-china-up-may-now-be-holding-it-back/258787/

Are We Wringing the Creativity Out of Kids?

Is any comment needed?

http://blogs.kqed.org/mindshift/2012/05/are-we-wringing-the-creativity-out-of-kids/

Better Childhoods Needed

“Poor children don't need better schools. Poor children need better childhoods.”

What else needs to be said?

http://susanohanian.org/show_commentary.php?id=1027

Gerald Coles: Why Bother Educating the Poor?

In the same vein, here is a background explanation, that is unpalatable reading, yet, in my opinion, is accurate. Shades of the 19th century, the only difference being that back then, the ‘deserving’ were children of the aristocracy, while now, the ‘deserving’ are children of the risk. Want to know more?  Read A Measure of Failure: The Political Origins of Standardized TestingBy Mark J Garrison.

http://blogs.edweek.org/teachers/living-in-dialogue/2012/06/gerald_coles_why_bother_educat.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+LivingInDialogue+%28Teacher+Magazine+Blog%3A+Living+in+Dialogue%29

Wednesday, June 27, 2012

A respected principal speaks out!

Please share with other NewZealand principals


Bruce

I have never felt so disgruntled with education.  I really don't know what to do.  We have developed a Concept Approach to teaching across the curriculum.  Thrown out numeracy and are pushing meaningful, creative, exciting maths learning.  It is more like the old days.


The problem is that I know we will get clobbered by the Education Review Office when they next come, because we are so out-of-line with what many of my colleagues view as the current malpractice!


I am bringing Charles Lovitt out from Melbourne to work with the staff on Mathematics.  Charles has directed several Australian National and State projects such as MCTP and Initiative 5.4 for Maths and Science.  He was director of Mathematic projects for the Australian Curriculum Corporation and generated such projects as The Maths Task Centre Project, The Chance and Data Project and, more recently, the Maths 300 Project.


He strongly believes that practicing teachers hold the wisdom of our profession stating that It is tapping into this wisdom via captured images from classrooms, which allows all of us to professionally grow and learn from each other for mutual benefit.


Lovitt's workshops explore extremely practical and immediately useable classroom activities.  However, their real purpose is to engage teachers in discussion about the role of such teaching and learning ‘ingredients’ as non-threatening learning environments, open-ended investigative approaches, meaningful contexts, technology support, visual and kinesthetic learning, concrete materials, catering for the “7-year-gap” of students’ abilities (success for all), creative unit planning, alternative assessments.   But what’s the point – his approach doesn’t fit the current constrained directives we have to adhere to.


 I certainly feel principals have been stifled and ridiculed if they speak out.


I have put an article that reflects my thinking on our school website.  It is attached below and I would be interested to know what others think.


 School - January 2011 - Position Statement

Our school is realigning its thinking about curriculum delivery and learning approaches.  There currently seems to be a significant mismatch between the ecology of learning and pedagogy we espouse and the reality of teaching and the demands placed upon New Zealand teachers.


New Zealand has adopted a scientific management approach to education.  In short, this means that much of what we do, in terms of assessment and data gathering, is about teacher accountability, not about children experiencing a well-rounded education that excites them to be intrinsically motivated learners.  Put another way, the clear thinking behind the ecology of learning resource and the commitment we have to the learning theory of Vygotsky (constructivist approach) is being hijacked.


Now, either we commit to this theory and align our teaching practices to it, or we abandon it and become part of the scientific management regime which clearly mistrusts teachers.  Scientific management uses the data-driven approach which attempts to measure every miniscule point of progress.  This approach has the consequence of breaking learning into little isolated pieces for the sake of measurement, certainly not for the sake of learning.


This is the Ê»jigsawʼ approach to teaching, based upon the behaviourist theory.  Current education administrators like this because they can easily measure progress and see who is performing and who is not.  Unfortunately, children do not learn in this way.  Learning is much more chaotic and happens over a longer period of time.


But oh no, we are set to label children as failures early in their primary school days, ignoring all that we know about how children learn.  Do we need to weigh a pig every day to see if it is getting any fatter?  I believe this analogy applies to children.  We want for them a well-rounded education that inspires a love of life and of learning.  We donʼt need to measure every little step of progress.


A common sight I see is teachers constantly engaged in monitoring and assessing children.  Clearly this takes them from the real task a teacher should be doing.  Sadly, young teachers know no better, because this is what they have been introduced to and believe is real teaching.


Interestingly, a real measure of growth last year was when we repeated the PAT Tests in Term 4.  What huge growth we saw in children.  Isnʼt that enough to convince us that our children do well?  Do we really have to measure every little step.  Could we not just have a couple of measures to satisfy our need to know, and allow us to get on with the real task of facilitating learning?


Is New Zealand really failing in its education system?  I think not!  To illustrate this further, consider our Rich Task Curriculum and our Modules Programme.  Children are engaged in an inclusive curriculum that gives them broad and rich experiences that open their world.  It is firmly based upon the Vygotysky approach to learning and is held up high as an excellent model of teaching!


Now consider our Mathematics and Reading programmes.  These, by their very nature of being leveled and staged, create an exclusive curriculum.  In other words, some children are excluded from learning certain concepts because they havenʼt reached Ê»that levelʼ!  Some will never reach Ê»that levelʼ while at primary school, and so we do them the injustice of excluding them from the curriculum.  We guarantee their failure by excluding them from knowledge and learning experiences.  Of course, we donʼt do this knowingly or intentionally, but we still do it.


Ironically, we consider Numeracy and Literacy to be of prime importance at primary schooling, and yet we donʼt use the model of excellent teaching we espouse for other Learning Areas of the NZ Curriculum.  Why not?  Very simply because they both easily fit the scientific model for accountability and can be measured in small steps.  Remember, this is for teacher accountability, not childrenʼs learning!  This has been masterly crafted by the scientific management approach and we have believed the lie!  Never has this been better illustrated than through the introduction of national standards.  Do we really need national standards to know what our children can do and have achieved?


The Vygotsky approach that we have so carefully crafted in our Rich Task Curriculum is based on a clear set of principles.  It is inclusive and principled in its approach.  Conversely, the approach adopted in teaching reading and numeracy has a set of Ê»unprinciplesʼ.  It is about realigning these areas to good theory and teaching practice that I would like to address at our school. My aim is to reduce the compliance culture, and by doing so, increase creativity.  There are some risks inherent in this idea, but I believe they are worth taking.  We just have to be cautious to ensure we have reliable evidence to satisfy the demands upon us.


We know what is wrong, we know what we want to do but the pincer net is closing in on us.  How do you survive in this environment?  I am seriously thinking it may be time to quit.  But I'll probably keep going until I get caught up with and then it will be all over!


Have you ever read the Dr Suess book, Diffendoofer Day.  It is worth tracking down a copy and reading it.  I use it as my guide at our school and am trying to convince myself this will still be the outcome in the end.

Sunday, June 24, 2012

Survival of the fittest or the best connected - Market Forces or creating conditions for all to thrive. A new look at Darwin.


Charles Darwin was possibly one of the most important scientists of all time. His theory of evolution changed forever the view of humans .The phrase 'survival of the fittest' , attributed to Darwin ( although he never said it), has been used to justify 'greed is good' capitalism and ,more recently, neo-liberal Market Forces competitive free market economic thinking.

 Steven Johnson, in his book 'Where Good Ideas Come From', writes that Darwin realised that the true story of nature was not just one of ruthless competition. Darwin understood well the paradox of the  importance of interdependence as well as competition. Johnson writes that the most creative ideas come from open environments where people share and build on each others ideas - in Darwin's day the coffee shop. Creating such fertile ideas environments is the theme of Johnson's book. Darwin developed his ideas after observing coral reefs.

Darwin's paradox - competition or collaboration.

 On April 4th 1856 Darwin stood at the edge of a coral reef in the Indian Ocean. He is at the edge of an idea - exploring a hunch, still hazy and unformed, that will eventually lead to the intellectual summit of the nineteenth century -  the theory of evolution.



The diversity of life  observed a coral reef delighted Darwin. Darwin's observations were to disprove the current theory that coral reefs were the summits of underwater volcanoes but rather were ecosystems built up over time by tiny organisms .

Johnson's book is about why it is that some environments squelch new ideas while others, like a coral reefs, breed them effortlessly.  Coral reefs create environments where biological innovation  flourishes.  The diversity of life fascinated Darwin but it would take him a long time before he could comprehend what he was observing. Why, he wondered, were coral reefs such engines of biological invention?

Competition it is still believed leads to innovation but when you look at innovation from a long term perspective competition turns out to be less central that we have been led to believe.  Survival of the fittest has been oversold - from a long term perspective openness and connectivity may be more important.

A coral reef  provides a platform for a diversity of interdependent life.  The reef, Darwin observed, is characterised by intricate and interdependent food-webs.  The true story of nature is not one of exclusively ruthless competition between selfish agents.   Darwin came to realise this. There is, he wrote, both symbiotic connections and survival of the fittest ; that collaboration is vitally important in the natural world. What makes the coral reef is so inventive is not the struggle for life but the way organisms have learnt to collaborate. This is the ultimate explanation of Darwin's paradox. 

Human innovation , Johnson writes, also requires such conditions to allow creativity to emerge - conditions where ideas  collide, emerge, recombine and  where new enterprises arise.

We need to build such environments in our schools. Johnson describes the intellectual habitat of a highly successful science laboratory as a ' superb environment for young kids ....it was an environment that encouraged people to think broadly and generally about task problems, and ones in which inquisitive kids feel free to to follow up their curiosity.'

Sounds like a  great school .

Shame is that  our current market forces competitive orientated government seems prepared to destroy such an environment by introducing competitive league tables which will destroy the valuable aspects of collaboration and connectivity and, in the process, narrow the curriculum as teachers will naturally begin to teach to the test - a version of the outdated ideas of ' survival of the fittest.

Governments could learn a lot by studying coral reefs.