It seems
that right-wing governments lay the blame to ‘problems’ identified in education
on the teachers themselves.
This is
certainly the case in New Zealand.
This may be
seen as simplistic but it has successful at the populist level and has led to a
broad acceptance by most people of the need to implement National Standards to
solve the problem.
It is all
very well for the teaching profession to criticize such developments but the
perception is well established. In reality the research indicates that the ‘achievement gaps’ lies beyond the school
gate and lies to a large part with the
difficult home circumstances of the identified ‘failing’ students.
It would be
better for teacher organisations or alternative political parties, to provide a
real alternative to the current market forces approach than be seen as
whinging
by being negative about imposed government changes.
An alternative vision |
As the
turtle said in Alice in Wonderland ‘It is time to think of other things’.
One informed critic, Kelvin Smythe, has done just that, defining an alternative educationalmanifesto. Smythe writes, ‘Forty years ago when neoliberals argued for
managerialism, which is about narrowing the curriculum for ideological purposes
(control, propaganda, and privatisation), they demonstrated both a philosophy
and imagination – we need to do the same for our ends’.
A good start
but not enough.
Opposition political parties need to take the
lead in developing a transformational vision for our country. They need not
only to be critical of the ideology of privatisation and growing corporate
control but more importantly create an inspiring and uplifting vision of an
alternative future.
The question
is what sort of country do we want to become or is the growing disparity of
opportunity something to be accepted or, worse still, ignored as it currently
seems?
The Labour
Party has yet to grab the attention of the voting public with what they see as
the future – the Greens have possibly done a better job in this respect with
their emphasis on a sustainable future. Together they might do better?
My own
vision would be to create New Zealand as a country that sees the creativity and
talents of all citizens as the country’s greatest resource and following this the
challenge would be to set about creating the conditions to achieve
this. One
suggestion might be the setting up of a range of conversations to provide
opportunities for ideas to arise. There are citizens from a range of areas who
would be well suited to contribute to such contributions.
Power of conversations |
Whatever
vision is created education is the key to its realisation.
Labour , at least, has a great education vision!
Labour , at least, has a great education vision!
The late business
philosopher Peter Drucker wrote that’ the first country to develop a
twenty-first education system will win the future’. Creativity expert Sir KenRobinson asks that we need to develop education system that develop the talents
of all students not one with its genesis in a past industrial age.
New Zealand
could be such a country that ‘wins the future’.
To develop a
vision of New Zealand as creative (sustainable and caring) society requires a
transformation of our current education system. In particular it will require a
dramatic shift from the current government’s standardisation ‘one size fits
all’ approach to a far more personalised style of learning/teaching.
So rather
than being side-tracked by focussing
the ‘achievement gap’ we need to start redefine the problem as solving the
‘opportunity gap’.
Andy Hargreaves |
Worldwide,
he continues, school systems have a battle on their hands. Even in Massachusetts a top performing system
a high powered business alliance (with links to Pearson publishing who provide
testing material!) is under threat from market force business orientated reformers who are suggesting
solutions that are the opposite to what the highest performing countries are
doing. This is similar scenario to what is unfolding in New Zealand. Even in
high performing Alberta success gained through past cooperation between
government and educationalists is at risk through the imposition of a
bureaucratic system of assessing teacher competence. If this is imposed,
international change expert Michael Fullan said it would ‘be like scorching the
earth to get rid of a few weeds’.
So
ironically, even in high performing systems where success is due to their
quality teachers, there are moves, against all international evidence, to
weaken the teaching profession in the name economic efficiency and external
accountability.
In contrast
New York is now realizing the message of Joni Mitchell’s lyric, ‘Don’t it
always seem to go, that you don’t know what you’ve got till it’s gone’. Schools
in the New York City school system are now being seen as basket cases, where,
after years of business led reform, there has been no overall positive impact
on student achievement. To sort out the problem a new agreement is being forged
to enable earlier maligned schools and teachers to focus on developing
innovative and flexible ways to figure out ways to improve student learning.
Schools a 'basket case' |
Unfortunately
for our neighbour Australia, the instigators of the New York reforms, have been
central to the introduction of similar efficiency reforms (including an
emphasis on National Testing called NAPLAN). We are well down the road in New
Zealand to a similar disaster with the introduction of National Standards.
Hargreaves
also mentions Sweden, once a poster child for social democratic excellence and
equity, but since its aggressive introduction of market forces educational
reforms has experienced the greatest deterioration of PISA scores.
Sweden’s
reforms have included the introduction of profit based ‘free’ schools (known to
New Zealanders as charter schools) modelled on the Anglo- American reforms of
England and the United States. As a result Sweden educational performance has
fallen behind the other high performing Scandinavian, countries, namely
Finland, and is moving towards the low performers England and the US. Countries
New Zealand is currently following.
PISA sidetracks learning! |
One last
country Hargreaves refers to is educationally endangered Wales.
Hargreaves was
member of a group that provided a report to improve the situation. The report recommended
the ‘building of the professional capital of the teaching profession’ and ‘stressed that social capital (how well
teachers work together) is as important as the human capital of what teachers
are able to do alone – and to this extent…advised that a nationwide commitment
to building strong professional communities amongst teachers should be
strengthened by giving these communities a clearer focus and by supporting them
with government funding so that they could occur in school time.’
Those who
are concerned with the development of New Zealand as a creative country would
be well advised to follow such recommendations.
Hargreaves
was clear, it is ‘important for the government not to get side-tracked by
raising scores on PISA but to establish a compelling and uplifting vision of
what it wanted…. learners to be.’
This vision, he writes, needs to provide a
direction for teaching and learning and to raise the status and respect of
teachers so they can realize such a vision.
In NewZealand we already have such an educational vision – the currently side-lined2007 New Zealand Curriculum – one widely respected by teachers; teachers
currently distracted by the pressure to implement National Standards.
Hargreaves concludes by saying, ‘we stand at
the crossroads of teacher quality, which path should we take – to build
teachers up or break them down’.
Hargreaves refers to Lyndon Johnson the 36th
President of the United States .
Standing at
his own crossroads of educational and social change Johnson was clear about the
path that America should take. ‘Education is not a problem’, he declared,
‘Education is an opportunity’.
It is time in New Zealand we faced up to growing
challenges of inequity and social dislocation that the market forces ideology
has created the past few decades and follow Johnson’s lead. The promised ‘trickle down’ has not occurred –
the rich have got richer and the poor poorer!
Our future
leaders need to create an uplifting inspiring vision of a creative, compassionate
and sustainable New New Zealand with teachers at the centre of such a
transformation.
A country
with opportunities for all.
2 comments:
Thanks for sharing that Bruce. Well done. If National return we can kiss goodbye to teaching being seen as a great career!
Thanks for sharing! Andy Hargreaves typically goes against the consensus when he makes ratings, but his overall track record appears to pan out
Post a Comment