A brief personal statement on the
holistic
The holistic begins
with a conception of the curriculum: a conception of it being a combination
of the cognitive and affective; a conception of it being a combination of
knowledges – teacher and academic; and a conception of the teaching and
learning within it being organised by broad aims.
This conception of
the curriculum has fundamental implications for school leadership and the
education system – as well as the nature of teaching. The holistic
curriculum requires for its well-being an extension to holistic leadership
within schools and a holistic education system.
There is an urgent
need for a holistic curriculum-driven leadership theory to be developed and
advanced to challenge the control-driven leadership theory. Holistic curriculum-driven leadership
theory leads to a democratic participatory education system; control-driven
theory to a control curriculum.
Kelvin Smythe |
Holistic
curriculum-driven leadership starts with a conception of a holistic
child-centred curriculum with the implications of that working upward
through to the leadership; control-driven leadership starts with a particular
concept of an adult-centred education philosophy with the implications of that
working downward through to the curriculum.
Just as the current
objective-based curriculum and control education system are different
expressions of the same philosophy – a control one; so are the holistic
curriculum and a democratic and participatory education system – a holistic one.
Time to focus on the NZC |
Control knowledge in
being measurable knowledge spurns the affective; holistic knowledge in being
expansive knowledge embraces it. Control knowledge is instrumental; holistic knowledge is democratic and
participatory. Control knowledge implies certainty and someone who knows; holistic knowledge implies openness and
continuing collective exploration about what is known. Control knowledge
because it implies certainty and someone who knows requires a hermetic system
based on fear and dependence; holistic
knowledge because it is about openness and continuing exploration requires
trust and independence. Control knowledge is exclusivist and standardising;
holistic knowledge is democratic and
characterised by variety.
Because the holistic
is about valuing variety; about democratic, participatory relationships – the
holistic means the freedom to be holistic not the requirement to be so.
Student centred learning |
Since the 1970s those
who support the education of control, mainly the political right, have had the
initiative in education, the political left, except when it implemented the
education agenda of the right in the late 1980s, has been bereft of policy,
mainly resorting to implementing a somewhat watered down version of control
education. Complementing this lack of
challenge to control education has been the ineffective opposition of teachers
and principals and their organisations.
The organisations
have occasionally been outspoken in opposing control education but, in the long
term, ineffective, because a changed
education system is not the absence of something but the presence of something
better to replace it. The teacher organisations have been dependent,
unsure, and lacking in philosophical depth, curriculum knowledge, and unity.
To answer the
challenge of the dominance of control education, the holistic is required, only
the holistic will challenge it, but
knowledge of the holistic, confidence in the holistic, has been fragmented,
cast in a bad light, and made forgotten.
Time to fight for holistic teaching! |
Teachers have become
bewildered participants in their own philosophical demise. Orwell wrote:
‘Who controls the past controls the future. Who controls the present controls
the past.’ Teachers have become bewildered participants in their own past being
made forgotten. To affirm their
knowledge and experience teachers need to agree on and reclaim their past. It
is a prime source of holistic knowledge the proponents of control do not have
access to. The past is not something ephemeral, it is something real that
teachers can use as a way to avoid becoming overcome by the present and, in
avoiding that, be better placed for the future.
My intention in
writing this brief statement was to set out the situation as I see it, mainly
leaving any implications to readers as they see it. If the situation as set
out is close to the truth, for remedy, it
calls for some extraordinary leadership.
Perhaps, I could
conclude with a story from my own past when, in 1999, I spoke to a group of
principals. My main message was that
given the morally and ethically complex times ahead, principals, in doing what
they had to do, needed to do that, but on the understanding that they retained,
as part of their thinking, the idea that much of what they had to do was not in
the best interests of children. They needed to make that distinction for
their own integrity, and to be able to
challenge that which was not in the best interests of children when
opportunities arose. I looked into the principals’ eyes and saw
incomprehension, diversion, and a glaze.
Time to see past National Standards |
With the Labour government set to take power (along with some other
contributory factors), I decided, after ten years, to end publication of
Developmental Network Magazine and campaigning for the holistic curriculum, and
take a break.
(Kelvin still intends
to posts his thoughts as required – let’s hope he does so. Few voices speak out
so loudly against the destruction of what was once was central in primary education.)
4 comments:
It seems we have had timid leadership from school principals at best - too many seem to have sold out. Maybe they are too busy to notice where the National Party is taking them? Or simply focussing on making their school look good?
A great follow on from the post on assessment.
Thanks Karyn and Anon
If we don't have a fight back by principals and teachers we will lose the creativity/holistic teaching that was a feature of NZ teaching. If we don't we will soon be in the test oriented environment of Aust England and the USA! Time to place the focus back on the 2007 NZ Curriculum.
When a principal in the late 80s I attended a meeting where Kelvin warned us of the difficulties ahead. I was so busy with implementing 'Tomorrows Schools' that I discounted Kelvin's warnings.
A year or so later I changed my mind as a realised Kelvin was right. The 95 technocratic NZ Curriculum was the tipping point for me!
Those who ignore his plea to keep holistic teaching central will live to regret their lack of insight. Time to put the focus on implementing the 07 NZ Curriculum and put National Standards in their place.
Post a Comment