Facing up to the elephant in the classroom - the
mind changing ideas of Jo Boaler
Prof Jo Boaler |
This book, by mathematics
Professor of Mathematics Jo Boaler, will transform your attitude to mathematics teaching. One school, led by an ex maths adviser, makes use of her ideas and a
school near me has bought multiple copies which has transformed the teachers
attitudes towards maths.
The expression ‘there is an
elephant in the room’ is the belief that ‘success in maths is a sign of general
intelligence and that some people can do maths and others can’t.’
Jo Boaler makes two main points –
maths can be a fun activity for all students but to achieve this needs the
removal of an approach based on ability grouping. The one in five currently failing in our
schools, (notwithstanding the effects of poverty) see themselves as failures, as defined by numeracy and literacy, and the premise of this book that this is, in good part, to the result of the
use of ability grouping. Jo Boaler’s book reports on the depressing research to
back her position on ability grouping.
What maths involved in observing monarchs |
‘Far too many students hate
maths’ Jo Boaler writes. ‘As a result adults around the world fear maths and
avoid it at all costs. Mathematics plays unique role in in the learning of most
children – it is the subject that makes them feel both helpless and stupid.
Maths more than any subject, has the power to crush children’s confidence….but
things could be completely different and maths could be a source of great
pleasure and confidence for people.’
‘When the real maths is taught
instead- the whole subject that involved problem solving, creating ideas and
representations, exploring puzzles, discussing methods any many different way
of working, then more people are successful.’
‘More worrying perhaps, students
are made to feel inadequate in maths from a very young age, which results in
their developing a very negative view of the subject.’
Inspirational book |
Jo Boaler’s book set out to
remedy this situation by making school maths more in line with real life
problem solving and in the process helping all children develop self confidence
in maths. Unfortunately maths in school
is used by teachers as a tool to sort, track and label children. This brutal
labelling is out of sync with the mixed ability teaching of counties that score
highly on international testing – Finland, Korea and Japan.
Maths classes need to change for
the better. Things need to change. People don’t like maths because of the way
it is misrepresented in school. Boaler argues that ‘school classrooms should
give children a sense of the nature of mathematics. The 2007 New Zealand
Curriculum makes it clear what is expected, ‘Mathematics is the exploration and
use of patterns and relationships in quantities, space and time’….’By studying
mathematics and statistics, children develop the ability to think creatively,
strategically and logically’. Such a meaningful approach ‘is critical in
halting the low achievement’ of many students in maths.
In real life mathematicians work
on long, often ill-defined, problems. Successful mathematicians have learnt to
problem solve, making use of enlightened trial and error (guessing and
estimating) and it is this approach children should get a ‘feel for’.
This is not the approach to be
seen in our schools. All too often maths is an isolated activity with children
being taught in ability groups to solve prescribed problems or questions set by
their teachers. As a result most students give up on the subject.
To bring back to life in
classrooms involves giving children a sense of living mathematics where
children are able to ask their own questions about maths challenges that appeal
to them – often to solve problems arising in other curriculum areas. This is applied maths; maths is a way of
interpreting the world – children doing something with their maths. ‘Children
need to engage, do, act, perform, problem solve for if they don’t use
mathematics as they learn it they will find it difficult to do so in other
situations.’ Boaler’s word echo the need
for students to ‘seek, use and create their own knowledge’ of the NZ
Curriculum, and one could add by working with others.
‘Schools’, she writes, ‘cannotkeep pursuing an educational model’ that results in most people giving up onthe subject. Teachers instead should aim at all their students enjoying and
succeeding at maths. ‘Children begin school as natural problem solvers’ – this
positive attitude needs protecting.
What is going wrong is the grouping of their students by ability a process that is increasing in UK
schools with the importance of national testing and targets. Almost all New Zealand schools use ability
grouping from the time students enter schooling. This grouping is done as early
as age 4 in England and 88% stay there until they leave school. Boaler finds
this a ‘chilling statistic’. ‘Such grouping contravenes basic knowledge aboutchild development and learning; children develop at different rates and they
reveal different strengths and dispositions at various stages of their
development.’ Ironically since the UK has introduced target the UK has dropped
from eighth to 24th in international tests of mathematical problem
solving.
The issue of the problem ofgrouping children by ability ‘goes against all research on children’s learningand effective forms of grouping’ but it is still the approach New Zealand
schools use – and in some cases children during maths times are grouped (set)
by ability across classes.
Exploring patterns in maths |
Boaler’s book provides plentiful
examples of real maths problem solving with students working collaboratively in
groups discussing their findings as they work towards solutions. This collaborative approach is in contrast
with the silent individual approach of most current school maths. Maths makes
sense as children talk through their ideas and listen to the thoughts of
others.
'to seek, use and create knowledge' |
‘Silent maths gives students the
wrong idea about mathematics; it is very hard to reason about mathematics when
working in silence’. ‘Mathematical discussions are also an excellent resource
for student understanding’. ‘Maths teachers need to organize productive
mathematical discussions.’ Such teaching needs realistic contexts where
students are given real that need mathematical analysis.’
Boaler’s book outlines in detail
effective classroom practices using a project based approach with students
working in mixed ability groups usually lasting about three weeks based around
authentic maths challenges resulting communicating what they have discovered.
The best models I can think of are the challenges students undertake as part of
Math’s Fairs (or Science or Technology challenges).
Maths project Winchester School |
Boaler is critical of the
hyper-accountability that is now a feature of school assessment and provides
positive ideas for assessment for learning to develop students as confident
problem solvers
Boaler’s book is a must for
schools who want to ensure all their students enjoy and succeed at maths and to
encourage teachers to see maths in a new light.
My advice is to buy a few copies
for your school to share with teachers and see what eventuates.
Jo Boaler u-tube
For more information read Charles Lovett
Jo Boaler u-tube
For more information read Charles Lovett
2 comments:
How interesting.
Why is it Maths ability seems to be genetic? Parents often say things like, I wasn't any good at Maths either. They never say that about Social Studies or Spanish.
In my experience, visiting my Yr 9 learners in Maths, there is a lot more emphasis on strategies (so getting the correct answer isn't down to luck, but down to making use of the right strategy), collaboration, and attempting to use real world contexts than when I last learnt Maths!
I also think for many children, Maths is only 'spoken' in class. It is like learning a new language and when you only use it in class 200 mins a week, it's hard to become fluent.
I also think many Maths teachers in the snr high school perpetuate the idea that only the brightest can study Maths at that level - I don't feel there is a lot of encouragement for Joe Average to persevere. It's las if they only want the 'brainest' kids in Yr 12 and 13 Maths.
I will definitely be looking up this book!
It's clear we all don't have the same innate talent in maths but we all are able to reach a comfortable level with the right teaching.
One problem is that in the West 'we' value ability while in Asian cultures 'they' value effort. And in such cultures education is valued and teachers ensure all achieve without demeaning ability grouping.
In Western cultures girls are not expected to do well.
Change the expectations, work on authentic topics collaboratively and maths will be a positive experience for all.
Post a Comment