Teaching in a Modern Learning Environment (MLE)
or an ILA – innovative learning environment or a FLE – flexible learning
environment.
Teaching in a Modern Learning Environment (MLE) offers an opportunity to extend the educational opportunities that can be offered to students.
To achieve anything that is more
than an extension than which can be achieved in ordinary classrooms is the
problem.
Architecturally ‘opening’ out the classrooms
will naturally make quite a difference to the learning situations for both
learners and teachers.
Students will be able to feel part of larger
more complex and initially exciting unit and this will apply to the teachers as
well but for the teachers in particular will be the feeling of being in a team.
This will allow teachers to share their problems and successes – and most
importantly will enable a variety of organisational arrangements to be made
imposable in self-contained classroom.
Theme based on local and famous churches |
These gains in themselves for both teachers and
students are considerable but if the teaching methods are only an extension of
‘traditional ‘ subject centred teaching then the advantages are minimal.
New
classroom design asks for a more imaginative approach.
Modern Learning Environments must be more than an architectural
innovation. Modern Learning Environments
provide the means to devise learning situations which open up the potential
for extending the learning of the students. It means attempting to develop
within the individual learner all the skills and attitudes of a competent
independent learner.
It means giving the students the chance to learn for their
own reasons rather than completing teacher arranged tasks which in many
traditional classrooms are completely divorced from the learners own reality.
These newer opportunities requires a new philosophy towards education.
It will
mean different things to different people but essentially it is a learner
centred approach which has as its key the need for all students to become
successful learners. Failure as a concept must be minimized and seem as a
learning opportunity and not a dominant feature as it is in our present
traditional approach. The needs and
attitudes of the students are of greater importance than the needs of any
traditional subject.
It can be seen that to operate a Modern Learning Environment can be
simply an extension of traditional teaching.
In the
present educational climate Modern
Learning Environments provide the glamour but innovative teaching can often
be seen in ‘ordinary’ classrooms.
Much of the current Modern Learning
Environment teaching is more correctly ‘team teaching’, a devise to teach
subjects using traditional methods in a new situation (streaming, ability
grouping and a focus on subjects). Merely individualising learning is an
extension of current practice and not an innovation.
To best take advantage of a Modern Learning Environment best
requires teachers who have achieved success developing creative programmes in a
contained classroom.
It will be
a challenge to extend such a philosophy in a diversified space. Necessarily
there will a considerable transitional period to introduce new ideas; a time
for all to adapt to the new conditions.
No doubt for a considerable length of time methods may have to be
utilised that may be contrary to the spirit of a Modern Learning Environment until new methods and new confidence
are gained by both teachers and students.
I wrote the above in the 1970s.
‘Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it’ Edmund Burke
‘Those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it’ Edmund Burke
In those times such flexible buildings were
called open plan schools. I have simply written in Modern Learning Environment to replace the original phrase of open
plan schools. In
the 1970s there was a movement (centering in the USA) known as ‘open’
education.
I worked with one of the few very successful
open units in the 70s one led by John Cunningham at Waitara Central in Taranaki
1974-5.
It was a unit cobbled out of three
prefabricated classrooms joined to a classroom.
This is a link to John Cunningham’s development of his version of open education in a traditional room which formed the basis of the teaching approach in the open unit.
Most of the
open plan schools eventually replied or closed off their walls and their success,
or lack of it, provides valuable learning for teachers involved in today’s
Modern Learning Environments.
The ideas that John and his team implemented were
(based on his notes):
1. To
develop a diversified day utilising group organisations to allow students
to work as individual with, where possible, a choice of activities; to develop
a ‘workshop’ type atmosphere with a number of subject areas progressing at any
one time.
2. To develop a curriculum based largely on the immediate environment (historical
and natural), student’s interests, all with a focus on providing students with first hand experiences. An
emphasis to be placed on careful observational work.
3. The importance of the development of skills to
assist the students to become independent and self-motivated learners, in
particular the need for students to work
carefully by slowing down the pace of their work and also to develop a range of
presentation skills.
4. Appreciating the importance of the total learning environment. This require students’ work to be
carefully displayed and new topics introduced by well-arranged teacher
displays. All visual space should be thoughtfully utilised. Every attempt
should be make the classrooms as stimulating and challenging as possible.
5. Every learner should experience success
and appreciate the need for self-discipline. Learning should be personalised as
well as individualised.
The Waitara open unit was based on a ‘nook and
cranny ‘model rather
than the ‘open prairies’ of the architecturally designed units - an approach
more suited for team teaching.
Theme based on Mount Taranaki Study |
Open plan units (or Modern Learning Environments)
require an evolutionary programme.
The 100
students and 4 teachers structured around four home groups deliberately keeping
the security of conventional classrooms but care was taken to avoid home rooms
returning to conventional teaching. The daily programme was evolutionary and as
teachers and students gained skills more choice was offered to students. Programmes
ranged from formal to flexible. As the year progressed programmes became more
student orientated.
There was a
need to ensure a balance of content areas to be covered and teachers focussed
on ensuring students’ were not occupied by busy ‘shallow’ work particularly
when given choices. Basic skill teaching to ensure independent was covered by
withdrawal groups as required.
Cooperative planning is a strength of open plan
teaching and the main themes of the activity programme were planned together.
Within this
planning there needs to be the necessary element of choice for teachers and
students – teachers strengths can be shared with all. From the ‘master plan’ teachers choose areas
to develop and share. Check lists are used to ensure all students cover planned
areas. At all times the unit has a number of activities being undertaken. The current
theme is introduced by teacher arranged motivational displays that are added to
by student work as the study progresses.
Science maths technology study based on local bridges |
Themes are chosen which offer a diversity of
subject areas and creative activities and are introduced to the whole group by
a selected teacher. Integrated learning.
After
starting in the home group students are involved in mixed ability groups with
the maths programme which features activity problem solving challenges and related
to the current theme study if appropriate. This is followed by language time –
once again integrated as required with the theme study. Students with special
needs are helped in small withdrawal group and then returned to the main
groups. Language time includes research
reading, spelling (words from the current
study) and handwriting also linked
with the current theme.
Snail art, maths and language |
Literature
usually starts the afternoon programme in home groups. The remainder of the day
involves students undertaking a range of tasks based around the theme working
with teachers with strengths in the area. Times are programmed for Maori culture,
music and PE with groups rotating. Whole unit singing on Friday and sharing of
work finish the week
For all this there is no one system of
organisation and the open unit offers opportunity for flexibility and change.
Sometimes an activity and withdrawal programme;
sometimes whole day student choice (true open education); sometimes students
take up choice from a range offered by the teachers.
Students are given considerable choice and are
free to move about and talk about their work.
Success depends on student ownership of tasks (group
or individual) and having the opportunity to have the skills in place to
achieve quality work – this includes presentation skills.
Special attention is given to finished work that
reflects the students own questions and research.
Student completed
work – their research, language, art and maths is displayed with the care it
deserves.
One quote that underpins the unit comes from Charles Silberman author of Crisis in the Classroom, ‘Happiness has got to derive from achievement and success not by just having a good time’.
One quote that underpins the unit comes from Charles Silberman author of Crisis in the Classroom, ‘Happiness has got to derive from achievement and success not by just having a good time’.
Themes introduced through teacher displays with student work later added |
Relevance to today’s Modern Learning
Environments.
Obviously
the ideas above were pre modern information technology but the basic issue remains
that to make such flexible, or innovative learning, spaces work depend on: pedagogical
leadership and alignment of staff; relationships between all involved; and the
quality of the learning undertaken by the students.
In all areas of life we need to look backwards to move into the future.
' Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it' Santana
‘We build our building and then they shape us’ Winston Churchill.
‘We build our building and then they shape us’ Winston Churchill.
Local historical swing bridge basis on an integrated study |
Modern Learning Environments 3
Bill Guild Pioneer Open Education teacher
Government paper on MLEs (NZ)
Bill Guild Pioneer Open Education teacher
Government paper on MLEs (NZ)
1 comment:
Greaat reading this
Post a Comment