This blog will be the first of series based on the book 'Creating Learning Without Limits.'
I broke a promise to myself to not buy any more educational
book but I couldn’t resist this one. And it didn’t disappoint.
I have never believed in the practice of teaching children
in ability groups but the use of such groups is taken for granted by most
teachers I have worked with over the years. How else do you cater for the range
of abilities of students in my class', teacher’s reply when asked? I would reply
but what about the harm done to those labelled as slow learners? This didn’t
seem to be a problem and still isn't.
When I taught I chose, against advice of the school, not to
use ability grouping instead choosing to help students individually, or in
small groups skills required and then returning students back to whatever they
were studying. The teachers who were advising me seemed to spend most of their
day worrying about reading and mathematics whereas I wanted to focus on inquiry studies, language and the creative arts.
Anyway I bought Learning
Without Limits which explores ways of teaching free from determinist
beliefs about ability.
The book critiques the practices of ability labelling
and ability focused teaching and examines the damage done to young
people by there use . The book's theme is positive and constructs a model of pedagogy based on
transformability, the mind-set that children’s capacity as learners are not
pre-determined and that with appropriate teaching all students can learn.
With the new deterministic emphasis on measured achievement
based on National Standards ability grouping is gaining greater popularity.
Schools are being asked to set targets
and being compared on their achieving results in literacy and numeracy .To gain
‘success’ have to comply to ‘best practice’ formulaic teaching differentiated
for the three or four ability groups. Some schools are even moving into setting
students across classes for literacy and numeracy. In secondary schools
streaming is still the practice. In primary schools such an approach is
resulting in a narrowing of the curriculum, teaching to the tests and the
side-lining of the creative arts. And in
countries where these ideas originate achievement levels are falling whereas,without this new emphasis, New Zealand has always been in the top performing group in
international testing in literacy and numeracy.
'Learning Without
Limits' is an antidote to such nonsense.
The book provides teachers who are unhappy about what they’re
being asked to do with an alternative– one that resonates to the creativeideas of New Zealand teachers past and present.
Teaching focused on ability grouping results in students
unconsciously indignity of ‘learning their place’. The view of ability has
a long history starting with now discredited IQ testing. Today teachers use
such grouping in ways they believe causes no damage but the evidence is
otherwise. For many schools it is an unquestioned practice – it is the way
things are done. Cross class setting and streaming exaggerates the problem for learners that need more time
The book outlines a more optimistic view of education free
from the constraints of ability grouping and in many respects it relates to the
work of teachers in the 60s and 70s when creative teachers did their best to
approach their work in a spirit of inquiry and adventure. Unfortunately the
early promise of 'child-centred learning' was never fully realised as it was subverted by traditional pressure
to group students and also by schools that over promised but couldn’t deliver.
By the mid-eighties the emphasis had swung to top down
hierarchical National Curriculums Ability grouping was firmly established and
alternative pedagogies were only for the determined. Briefly, in New Zealand,
the 2007 New Zealand Curriculum and
talk of personalisation of learning by the then Minister of Education providednew inspiration.
'Learning
Without Limits', after interpreting what went wrong, and following practical
research by a number of teachers come to very different conclusions.
The book
outlines a vision of schooling that allows everybody to enjoy a full education
to realise their gifts and talents.
The authors quote Stephen Jay Gould ('Mismeasure of Man') to capture the author’s central concerns.
‘We pass through this world but once. Few tragedies can be
more extensive than the stunting of life, few injustices deeper than the denial
of an opportunity to strive or even hope by a limit imposed from without but falsely
identified as lying within.’
The book is concerned that the talents and gifts of many
young children remain untapped throughout their formal education. That , because of teacher mindsets about the value of ability grouping, not muchcan be achieved by those children from disadvantaged social backgrounds; those who do
not enter schools with the ‘social capital’ to become positive learners’.
As the current reforms being imposed on schools by
politicians fail or plateau, the time will be right for teachers to introduce a
personalised pedagogy that promises a more promising and equitable improvement
agenda- one led by educational research in tandem with creative teachers.
Getting rid of the often unintended consequences of ability
grouping labelling is the first step; even just thinking about their use from
the point of view of the learner.
I plan to write further blogs to describe the ideas
formulated in this book.
Buying the book was worth breaking my promise.
.
7 comments:
Clearly a good read Bruce.
The Laws of Unintended Truths produced this phrase in your blog.
"The book provides teachers whore unhappy about what they’re being asked to do.."
Probably nothing more to be said really.
Ooops! But you are right teachers , or more schools,do 'sell out' on their principles under pressure to ensure they are seen as successful. In the UK ,with the emphasis on literacy and numeracy, ability grouping is increaing.In NZ, with National Standards, teachers and parents will see students as below, average or above average based on achievement determined in two areas. Such a 'sell out' fits in with the current political 'winner/loser' ideology.
Maybe my error was pertinent ?
Ability grouping fits in well with that other law - The Law of Unintended Consequences.
The use, or not, of ability grouping depends on ones view of how people learn. Lots of for and against on Google!
I agree totally. I teach in a school where ability grouping is almost enforced and aslo setting of studnts for maths by ability across classes. I appreciate the thinking behind such practices but it is in opposition to the integrated teaching I believe in. Such practices make inquiry learning across the curriculum almost impossible. Literacy and numeracy is all the leadership team seem to worry about. But what choice do I have?
It is difficult to try alternatives in such an environment - that's why most innovative teaching in the past happened in small schools by teaching principals.
What is required today is for whole schools to introduce inquiry based programmes seeing literacy and numeracy as 'foundation ' sklis that contribute to current studies.
Ideal advice - find a school led by a courageous principal. Pretty difficult. I guess the best thing is to do your best to integrate literacy and numeracy and, in those two areas, use whole class investigative experiences and then help individuals ( or groups with similar problems) as required.
Hi there. Very briefly. My youngest son was recently placed in what he considered to be the 'wrong' 'set' for English. Up until this point he had been in the 'top' set and had been 'downgraded' for no apparent reason. I agreed with his appraisal and contacted the school. I spoke with the head of the English department. She explained (tried to justify) the placement by saying that my sons previous set and the one he had now been assigned to were pretty much the same level. How can they be the same and yet different? It transpired that in reality a major factor in this instance was to do with juggling numbers between departments……..After being dismissed, I sent an e-mail stating that children are damaged by being labelled at an early age and that there was no justification for treating my son or any other child in this way.
My son is extremely articulate with a command of the English language beyond his years. Of course I put this down to the fact hat he didn't go to school until he was 10. He was educated at home.
Hi Ansell
That's ability grouping for you - more for the teachers/schools convenience than the students education
Post a Comment