Conditions can limit or encourage optimum growth
This is the fourth blog based on the book Teaching Without Limits based on the experiences of nine teachers teaching free of deterministic beliefs about ability.
All the teachers involved had to work in an environment that will soon
become commonplace for New Zealand teachers unless teachers make a stand –
targets, an emphasis in literacy and numeracy, national testing and league
tables.
In New Zealand, it is
fair to say primary teachers do not see ability grouping as an issue but I believe
in the long run it has destructive effect on the learning of those in the lower
groups – contributing to the achievement tail of failing students and
students who leave schooling alienated
from learning unable to read and write
All the teachers were
guided by the belief in the transformability of learning. Through tasks and
activities they provided, the learning contexts, their relationships with their
students they were all seeking to enrich the learning opportunities to strengthen
in all students the desire to learn.
The shared principles
that evolved will all ring a bell with creative teachers were:
The importance of the impact of their teaching on their
pupil’s emotions - that learning is
determined by positive emotional wellbeing of individual learners.
Students need to feel positive about their learning – tasks need to make sense to them.
Feeling of
competence, of success, and control of their learning is essential.
Classrooms need to be seen as a place where young people come
because they find activities which they
find engaging, interesting and enjoyable.
Positive student
identities are gained through achievement not being judged by comparative
ability
A guiding idea is the
a view of young people’s future that is hopeful, open and in the making.
Students need to appreciate their own growing learning power – that they can
make a difference.
That learning depends on the support given by other students
– learning is social.
Students need to feel
a sense of belonging, acceptance and mutual - equal members in the learning
community - all working towards shared goals. Relationships skills need to
be developed.
Teachers need to be
tough mined and passionate about intellectual life of the class.
All students need to
feel success and engage in worthwhile learning - whether knowledge,
understandings or skills.
Knowledge,
understandings and skills are only powerful if they are relevant – learning
is about making sense of the world- about making connections –able to transfer
their learning in new contexts.
Teachers need to put
a strong emphasis on the higher cognitive skills of explaining their
thinking, their insights, their reasoning and their conclusions. Students need
to develop a language for talking about their thinking – metacognition.
The above were the
recurring themes expressed by the teachers and at first glance they seem to be
the ones most teachers endorse but they are fundamentally incompatible with
ability labelling. The teachers, by becoming aware of the limits of
learning imposed by ability labelling, have gained greater insight about what
needs to be done – or undone.
All teachers have a
common belief in the power of transformability – that all can learn if the
right conditions are in place.
They all believe that
classroom conditions can change, and be changed to enrich and enhance learning
and free learning from the limits ability grouping.
Power must be shared
with students (co-agency) if students are to take full advantage of learning
opportunities.
Choices must be made
in the interests of everybody, that everybody must be equally respected and
valued. That students ought not to see their classroom as divided into
three groups with different needs.
All the above ideas
contribute to a practical pedagogy that
is informed by the belief in the transformability of the learning capacity of
all students and in the process to bring about greater justice and fairness in
education.
For me, all theabove, reflects the creative teaching that I have seen over the decades inprimary classrooms in New Zealand. Even though many of the teachers I have
admired made use of ability grouping it was not the dominating feature as it is
in classrooms today.
The whole issue of
sorting and assessing students by ability is becoming dominant in classrooms
today. Unlike the teachers in Learning Without Limits, teachers in New Zealand have not yet had to face up to national
testing and league tables.
Such anti educational
approaches are not far off – the time is now right if action is to be taken.
2 comments:
There is no doubt that the use of ablity grouping is unquestioned in primary schools.
Your recent blogs have made me think hard about the use - or misuse of them.
I guess that is a start?
The implemenation of National Standards will make such grouping even more important - or disasterous for the below average students!
Teaching without limits is designed to be a helpful and immediately useful resource for teachers. I think the same that teachers need to be tough mined and passionate about intellectual life of the class.
Post a Comment